Statura IntelligenceStatura IntelligenceBETA
Search anything: people, bills, firms, vendors, budgets, news…⌘K
South Miami

Meeting

March 30, 2026

What happened

Statura summary

The only substantive action on this agenda was a package of disclosure rules for local public officials, and the real move was procedural: it forces written disclosure of the subject of a communication, allows a written communication to be read into the record, lets officials conduct investigations and site visits in quasi-judicial matters, and requires those disclosures before or during the public meeting. That is a transparency and record-building regime, not a policy reversal, so the practical winner is anyone who wants a cleaner paper trail and the practical cost falls on officials and advocates who rely on informal back-channeling. Taken together, the four items read like one coordinated set of guardrails around how officials handle outside input and quasi-judicial fact gathering. The second-order effect is that the meeting process itself becomes the battleground, because the rules define when communications must be disclosed and when they can be placed on the record. The rest of the agenda is procedural and informational by nature, so the only thing that really moved here was the disclosure framework.

Statura-generated summary of the official agenda and minutes. Verbatim per-item votes and dollar figures are in the Agenda & votes tab.

Key decisions

  1. The elected or appointed public official shall disclose in writing the subject of the communication and the
    Pending

    Requires written disclosure of the subject of a communication, which shifts influence into the public record and makes informal lobbying harder to hide.

  2. A local public official may read a written communication from any person. Any written communication
    Pending

    Allows written communications to be read, which broadens what can be aired publicly and strengthens the record for interested parties.

  3. Public official may conduct investigations, make site visits and receive expert opinions regarding quasi
    Pending

    Authorizes investigations, site visits, and expert opinions in quasi-judicial matters, which formalizes fact gathering and raises the importance of the hearing process.

  4. Disclosure made pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above must be made before or during the public meeting
    Pending

    Sets the timing for disclosure before or during the meeting, which locks transparency into the live process instead of after the fact.